← Voice corpusEdition 2026-10-10, preview.
XThread

Source item

Open original source ↗
1/2 It's not about guts! It's about insurance. Tankers are expensive ($100m). Shipping companies issue bonds to buy them, which have covenants (rules) requiring the proper insurance to sail (war risk in this case). The crews are for it; they get a bonus for sailing war zones. 2/2 Yesterday @mercoglianos had a great point about the difference between "seapower" (1 word) and "sea power" (2 words) or maybe "$ea power." Seapower is military power "$ea power" is the ability to have commercial trade. The main purpose of the Navy is to protect shipping lanes and allow commerce to flow on the high seas. This was the reason the US created a Navy in the early 1800s: to fend off piracy and allow trade. The Navy seems to have forgotten about "sea power" and only thinks in terms of "seapower." Maybe if they had attended conferences like this over the last few years, they would have better understood "$ea power" and not been surprised by the insurance companies pulling back effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz. https://t.co/8W6Nc5j4Rp
2 segments

Segment 1 · characters 0–279 · Original segment ↗

Segment 2 · characters 281–1052 · Original segment ↗

Quoted context

These are the quoted author’s words.

'SHOW SOME GUTS': President Trump addressed the recent spike in oil prices during an interview with @kilmeade as the conflict in Iran enters its second week. "These ships should go through the Strait of Hormuz and show some guts, there's nothing to be afraid of... They have no Navy, we sunk all their ships..."

foxandfriends ↗

If the Navy truly cared about reopening Hormuz to shipping, they’d have a dozen officers and a few admirals at the most important shipowner event in the Americas. I post this every year. Every year the Pentagon sends… nobody. https://t.co/o4ZnHgu15W

johnkonrad ↗
Library as of 2026-10-22