← Voice corpusEdition 2026-10-10, preview.
XThread

Source item

Open original source ↗
Western politics is zero-sum. For every 51% election winner, a 49% loser. However, the intensity of the competition actually turns it negative-sum. Each succeeding 51% election winner weaponizes (and thereby destroys) legacy institutions to fend off the 49% loser, leaving less for both parties after each cycle. The political conflict is so intense because the West is in relative economic decline. Unfortunately, intense conflict further accelerates that decline. Roon (@tszzl) is correct that the still largely positive-sum culture of Silicon Valley and the zero-sum culture of Washington DC couldn't be more different. I'd argue the next step is to realize that the Internet is now bigger than the physical Silicon Valley. Most major technologies in the physical world have already largely decentralized away from SV, as has been widely reported. And digital decentralization is also well underway if you look at the graphs for unicorns, crypto, and AI: Then, the next step is to realize that the dysfunctional Washington political system is not really capable of managing the global economy that they inherited. Indeed, the last several years have been about smashing all trade and diplomatic relationships to bits, and thereby ending the dollar economic zone. There's at least one round of money printing to go, but once that's done it'll end the Keynesian business model that funds the 20th century welfare/warfare state. Much consternation will then ensue. However, we do still have the Internet. And there are more Internet users than Americans, Internet currency is replacing US currency, Internet services are replacing US services (eg email vs USPS, SpaceX vs NASA, Uber vs taxi medallions), and in general the Internet economy is replacing the US economy — as we can see from the graph of the Magnificent 7 vs the S&P 493: So, even after the Western political system crashes, the Internet will stay up. Can we restore from cloud backup? Can we somehow print out the Internet? That is: we already print out Google Docs as pieces of paper, we "print" out Amazon shopping carts to our front door, and we "print" out Ubers to the curbside. Perhaps we can generalize this idea to similarly print out functional social networks from the Internet. Perhaps we can materialize cloud communities into the physical world, that actually are once again capable of democratic self-governance, because they agree on foundational premises, and aren't constantly fighting over 51/49 questions. Perhaps that's a new birth of freedom, even after the Western political system crashes. We'll see. @tszzl Good point. My counterargument is that (a) those countries are essentially just protectorates of the US, and hence downstream of US elections and (b) the specific dynamics differ, but the financial and political situation is similarly dire. https://t.co/W1ED5QxAe8 https://t.co/kfEh9ChtC7 Yes, but: (1) Relative strength is critical because the US business model is issuance of the global reserve currency. Losing relative status means losing that. (2) Much of the US economy is fake & financialized. Look at the debt and production graphs. https://t.co/rhWLOzMui5
4 segments

Segment 1 · characters 0–467 · Original segment ↗

Segment 2 · characters 469–2597 · Original segment ↗

Segment 3 · characters 2599–2894 · Original segment ↗

Segment 4 · characters 2896–3173 · Original segment ↗

Quoted context

These are the quoted author’s words.

one thing that was immediately palpable in washington is that everyone has incredibly intense and baroque friend-enemy distinctions. there are whole catalogues, subgroups of people who we like and don't like. there is an exhaustive mental list of gossip and calculation about who is getting iced out of which circles and for what reason. there is paranoia about being associated with the wrong crowd. maybe if you are caught hanging out with writer X someone in the white house’s inner circle will deem you insufficiently patriotic and end your career. this all makes sense of course as political influence is a mostly zero sum game and requires all kinds of warfare to wield effectively. I got the distinct sense that the place would exhaust and ruin me very quickly, as someone who needs to meet someone twice before even remembering their name. this is all very interesting coming from san francisco where commercial interests and market forces rein supreme and even companies who are purportedly competitors today have free movement of services and people between them. good relations must be maintained, you go to parties with your friends at the ‘enemy’ labs, and in general the market forces you to assume the best of everyone. "best" in a limited sense, which means - your counterparties are rational actors looking for nonzerosum profitable exchange, with asymmetric upsides. silicon valley encourages you to be broadly friendly with everyone, and make time for everyone due to the low but real chances of extreme upsides from these interactions. though of course there is some amount of intense strategy and gamesmanship at the highest levels, the rank and file rarely think about this. both places attract the type of people who are capable of the kind of social interaction that is demanded by the respective environments and likely filters them very quickly. If you are too broadly trusting in washington, i am sure your head will end up on a metaphorical spike shortly thereafter. It also makes sense that everyone in dc seems to be undergoing a religious revival - encouraging extremely specific sectarianisms and beliefs - despite the underlying implication that everyone is having exciting and perhaps sordid personal lives. There is a warmth and spice of life to the ongoings in washington that reminds you of history, and the fukuyama quote: "The end of history will be a very sad time. The struggle for recognition, the willingness to risk one's life for a purely abstract goal, the worldwide ideological struggle that called forth daring, courage, imagination, and idealism, will be replaced by economic calculation, the endless solving of technical problems, environmental concerns, and the satisfaction of sophisticated consumer demands."

tszzl ↗

@balajis Most western countries have proportional elections and/or run off elections, not winner take all. Zero-sum and gerrymandering are features of Anglo countries like Canada, the UK and especially the U.S. But not most of the western industrialized world.

lhfang ↗
Library as of 2026-10-22