Source item
Open original source ↗AMD reused our code + modified for the benchmarks that show they're faster than Nvidia for training
Few major caveats
They didn't use pytorch native attention backend
They used out of tree attention for MI300, but didn't give NV the same benefit or even the main tree version
1/2
They coulda used main tree or FA3 and achieved way better perf
They used an out of tree GQA attention, but didn't enable the pytorch native gqa for Nvdia.
Nvidia likely retests with bunch of Megatron and Vboost profiles to show even higher perf
2/2
https://t.co/riIuq6X8Zn
3 segments
Segment 1 · characters 0–279 · Original segment ↗
Segment 2 · characters 281–529 · Original segment ↗
Segment 3 · characters 531–554 · Original segment ↗
Quoted context
These are the quoted author’s words.
SemiAnalysis code is the basis of AMD's training benchmarks 🫡 https://t.co/pxvCpzKjAw
dylan522p ↗