Source item
Open original source ↗2 segments
Segment 1 · characters 0–107 · Original segment ↗
Segment 2 · characters 109–111 · Original segment ↗
Quoted context
These are the quoted author’s words.
The presumption that the Fed raising short-term rates reduces inflation is predicated on the belief that higher rates reduce demand and investment. But what if higher rates don’t reduce demand and investment because the demand for intelligence and energy is unaffected by higher rates because winning the race for super intelligence has a near infinite ROI and the demand for compute will remain incalculable. Why won’t higher rates at this unique moment in history therefore lead to more inflation as interest costs are embedded in everything? And the problem is compounded as the more the Fed raises rates, the more inflation we will have and the more the Fed will need to raise rates further and so on. But what if the old models don’t apply to the current paradigm and the Fed is wrong? I think the Fed might have just made a mistake. Am I right or am I wrong?
BillAckman ↗
1/x It is time to wake up to the fact that the Fed has little to no power to control price inflation…the fact that they are charged w/ price stability in today’s economy is a charade….For 43 yrs the Fed has lowered rates & For 43 yrs the result of this policy has been secular
jam_croissant ↗