Source item
Open original source ↗Networks are a better mental model than states.
Within a state, there are many networks. From ideological groupings to digital communities. They aren’t internally homogenous.
Between states, the countries themselves belong to networks. Multilateral fora like ASEAN or WEF.
China is the closest exception to the rule. Perhaps the most internally homogenous large state, and least globally dependent on others. But even China isn’t fully an exception, if you look closely.
All these types of informal networks are becoming more important, relative to formal states, as the 20th century ends and the Internet century begins.
Quoted context
These are the quoted author’s words.
I have a friend in the security world, high in the security world, who speaks of "power centers" rather than govt's or nations and seems to feel that the world is more a set of rival and allied "ventures" than a game of Risk in the old sense. I'm coming around to this idea.
walterkirn ↗